Turing replaced a question about thinking with a test of imitation
Turing's 1950 paper proposes an indistinguishability test rather than a definition of thinking, the frame every companion app's persona now inverts.
Read piece →Topic shelf · 17 records
The category’s commercial moves, precedents, launches, and policy context.
Historical records and commercial developments help separate category precedent from a claim about present-day product availability.
Turing's 1950 paper proposes an indistinguishability test rather than a definition of thinking, the frame every companion app's persona now inverts.
Read piece →Weizenbaum's 1966 paper describes a keyword-matching script and warns that its illusion of understanding is dangerous.
Read piece →The Loebner Prize ran from 1991 to 2019, and a formal 1994 critique argued its judged format could not validate machine intelligence.
Read piece →A 2000 patent filing shows SmarterChild's screen-name login let one bot reach users already inside AOL and MSN chat networks.
Read piece →Bandai's own history page dates Tamagotchi to 23 November 1996 and puts shipped units above 100 million as of mid-2025.
Read piece →Sony's November 2017 press release for the new aibo makes cloud-plan enrolment necessary for the robot to function.
Read piece →Microsoft's March 2016 blog post says a coordinated attack, not autonomous learning, drove Tay's offensive tweets.
Read piece →The 2018 XiaoIce paper optimises for conversation-turns per session, not correctness, and reports over 660 million users.
Read piece →Replika's own history page names its founders and mission but sends readers elsewhere for its 2015 origin story.
Read piece →A 70-person 2017 JMIR trial found reduced depression symptoms in college students using the Woebot chatbot for two weeks.
Read piece →Meta's AI Studio announcement and its 2026 shutdown notice show how a creator-AI feature launched, spread and was later retired.
Read piece →The investor's and the company's own posts fix the date, the backers and the usage figures, but not the amount raised.
Read piece →Three advocacy groups' own filing alleges deceptive Replika marketing and reviews, described here only as allegations.
Read piece →Groove X's and LOVOT's own pages describe a robot built only for affection and sold with a required monthly fee.
Read piece →A 2025 Therabot trial, an OpenAI-MIT study and a 2017 Woebot trial show how sample size and disclosed funding change a claim's weight.
Read piece →Lovot's maker prices a subscription-model companion robot around care plans, as its own pages state on retrieval.
Read piece →A dependency map reveals when model, cloud, speech, app-store and payment choices converge on the same few suppliers.
Read piece →